The Neshaminy
Board of School Directors met on September 12, 2000 in the Board Room of the
District Offices, Maple Point Middle School.
The following persons were in attendance:
BOARD MEMBERS:
|
ADMINISTRATORS:
|
Mr. Edward Stack,
President
|
Dr. Gary Bowman
|
Mr. Harry Dengler,
Jr., Vice President
|
Dr. Raymond
Boccuti
|
Mrs. June
Bostwick
|
Mr. Harry Jones
|
Mrs. Yvonne
Butville
|
Mr. Richard
Marotto
|
Ms. Carol Drioli
|
Mr. Joseph
Paradise
|
Mr. Richard
Eccles
Dr. Ruth Frank |
Mr. P. Howard
Wilson
Mr. Bruce Wyatt |
George Mecleary,
Jr., Esq.
Mr. Steven Schoenstadt |
OTHERS:
Approximately nine persons from the public, staff
and press |
|
|
SECRETARY: Mrs.
Carol Calvello
|
|
|
|
1. Call to Order
Mr.
Stack called the meeting to order at 8:05 p.m.
2. Pledge of
Allegiance
Mr.
Stack requested that those in attendance join in the salute to the flag.
3. Announcement
Dr.
Bowman introduced Mike Taylor, student representative. He explained Mike Taylor and Kelly Schailey are this
year’s student representatives and will be attending the Board’s Public
Meetings. Prior to the Work
Session, Dr. Bowman met with Mike and Kelly.
4. Public
Comment
There
was a two minute time limit per speaker. Mrs.
Cahill, Langhorne, stated her two children attend the Queen of the Universe
School. She expressed concern about
her children arriving late at school every day and having to wait 20 to 30
minutes for the bus after school is dismissed.
She explained her children are scheduled to board bus no. 10 at 7:50 a.m.
The past five mornings the bus has not arrived at the bus stop until 8:00
a.m. and 8:03 a.m. School starts at
8:00 a.m. The Transportation
Department has been advised of the situation.
Mrs. Cahill pointed out at the end of the school day (2:30 p.m.), the bus
has been arriving at approximately 3:00 p.m.
The students are arriving home 20 to 30 minutes later than they did last
year.
Mr.
Schneider, Langhorne, explained his son attended the Our Lady of Grace School
for seven years. This is the first
year he is being home schooled. He
noted the Neshaminy School District does not allow home schooled students to
participate in extra-curricular activities.
He stated the taxpayers, including parents of those students who are home
schooled, are paying for the extra-curricular activities.
He pointed out the value of the extra-curricular activities for the well
being of the children. He felt
Neshaminy is saying certain children should be excluded from these activities.
He pointed out it cannot be a matter of the following:
·
Scheduling - Home schooled students have tremendously flexible
schedules.
·
Academics - Neshaminy oversees the academic
program.
·
Cost - Taxpayer dollars go into the program.
Mr.
Schneider said what is stopping a home schooled child from being involved in the
extra-curricular activities that all taxpayers are paying for including the
parents of the home schooled children?
5.
Items for Discussion
a. Strategic
Plan
Information
distributed prior to the meeting. Dr.
Bowman advised the Board that Joann Perotti, Intermediate Unit No. 22, is
certified by the Cambridge Management Group to facilitate strategic planning.
As a service to the school districts, the Intermediate Unit provides the
time, talent and skills necessary to help the school districts through the
strategic plan process. Use of an outside consultant for this service would cost
$5,000 to $10,000. The Intermediate
Unit does not charge the school districts for this service. The District’s strategic plan must be approved by the Board
and submitted to the Department of Education by September 30, 2001.
Dr. Bowman introduced Ms. Perotti.
Ms.
Perotti explained her responsibilities at the Intermediate Unit include working
in the area of internal and external communications, running the Education
Foundation and strategic planning. She
explained she is certified in the Cambridge process of strategic planning.
She reviewed the various school districts and organizations she has
worked with in the development of their strategic plans.
Five to six years ago the Intermediate Unit worked with Neshaminy in the
development of its strategic plan.
Ms.
Perotti presented an overview (using transparencies) of the strategic plan
process, which included the following:
Definition
of strategic planning: “…The
means (including process and discipline) by which an organization
continually recreates itself toward extraordinary purposes
-Importance
of a strategic plan:
·
Expresses common values, purpose and
expectations
·
Establishes and maintains quality standards
·
Ensures effective distribution of resources
·
Guarantees optimal return on investment
-Definitions:
Strategic
Operational
Longer-term future
Shorter-term future
Growth or change
Maintenance
Whole systems
Programs, projects
Values/mission-driven
Budget-driven
Answers the questions Answers the questions
Who?
How?
Why?
When?
What?
-Process
and Discipline:
·
Confirm commitment and readiness
·
Prepare for planning
·
Build strategic planning team
·
Conduct first planning session
·
Communicate draft plan to public
·
Build action teams
·
Develop action plans
·
Conduct second planning session
·
Prepare implementation schedule (with
supporting resource plan)
·
Obtain Board approval
·
Develop capacity for implementation
·
Validate plans and process continually
Copies
of the presentation transparencies will be provided to the Board members in the
next Board mailing
Ms.
Perotti explained the entire process will take six to eight months.
She stated the Intermediate Unit would like to work with Neshaminy
on the development of its strategic plan.
Dr.
Bowman advised the Board next month he will discuss the issue of selecting a
Cabinet member to serve as an internal facilitator. The internal facilitator will work with the Intermediate Unit.
Ms.
Drioli indicated she supported Ms. Perotti being Neshaminy’s Intermediate Unit
facilitator. Dr. Frank stated
when the previous strategic plan was developed, she served on the Strategic
Planning Committee. The
Intermediate Unit’s assistance was very helpful and the District benefited
from their assistance.
Dr.
Bowman pointed out the last time the Vocational-Technical School developed a
strategic plan, it called for a new school.
The new comprehensive technical school was opened this year.
Ms. Perotti stated when the plan was developed, she was the internal
facilitator at the Vocational-Technical School.
The strategic plan drove the development of the comprehensive technical
school.
More
strategic plan information will be provided next month.
b. Video
Cameras on Buses
Information
distributed prior to the meeting and additional information distributed at the
meeting. Dr. Bowman advised the
Board the solicitor has provided an opinion that it would be appropriate to
place video cameras on school buses under certain conditions.
Currently, there are no video cameras or black boxes installed in
Neshaminy buses. Mr. Paradise
explained $4,500 has been budgeted for the purchase of video cameras and black
boxes. It is estimated six cameras
could be purchased with the budgeted funds.
Mr.
Mecleary expressed concern about the erosion of privacy.
He pointed out video cameras are becoming more and more prevalent
everywhere. People know what the
next person is doing all the time. It
is an incremental step that is easy for anyone to take and difficult to argue
against. He stated when you look at
the bigger picture, you can see the slow erosion of rights.
There seems to be a complacency with a lot of the civil liberties we have
had in the past. He expressed
concern as to where video cameras would next be installed.
Mr.
Mecleary stated he does not have a specific problem with the video camera
proposal. However, it is one more
incremental erosion of privacy. The
use of video cameras on buses is probably very effective. He stated he could not support the proposal.
Dr.
Frank noted the Intermediate Unit is sponsoring an Act 23 workshop entitled
“Liberty and Diversity in Public Schools,” and the workshop will touch on
the issue of what is legal and what is an infringement. Mr. Mecleary stated it is not necessarily a legal issue.
He said he is more concerned about what is happening to personal rights.
Ms.
Drioli stated she will probably vote in favor of video cameras being installed
in school buses. Some of the bus
drivers have asked her to support the proposal. She said it has become a sad set of affairs that the District
has to put video cameras in buses so children know how to behave and be
threatened with exposure.
Mr.
Schoenstadt stated he supports the proposal.
He pointed out there is a tremendous dollar cost due to damages to buses,
and the taxpayers pay for the repairs. There
is no expectation of privacy on public transportation.
The school buses provide public transportation.
Therefore, there is no expectation of privacy and there should not be an
expectation of privacy. The
District has the right to protect its property, identify those who damage
District property and bill the parents for the damage.
There is no hidden meaning or hidden expectations.
Mrs.
Bostwick felt the proposal should be more carefully thought out before it is
approved. She recommended a policy
be developed specifying what will be done with the data and how the punishment
will be applied. She said she did
not want violation reviews to be decided on a case by case basis.
The parameters and punishment should be uniform for all violators and no
exceptions made. She also expressed concern about loss of personal rights.
Dr.
Bowman stated the cameras might catch some students misbehaving and damaging bus
seats. However, the real purpose of
the proposal is student safety and prevention.
The cameras will be a preventive tool.
He noted the District has not had any really serious bus accidents.
Due to the increase of traffic volume over the last ten years, it is more
difficult to drive a bus today than it was ten years ago.
There are 14 Neshaminy schools and the District buses to over 110 schools
within a ten mile radius. The bus
driver’s primary job is to safely deliver students from point “A” to point
“B”. Any measure that can be
taken to eliminate the bus driver being distracted and to make the bus ride a
safer ride for the students would be helpful.
He noted it is a small cost item. There
are Pennsylvania school districts that have procedures in place in the form of
guidelines.
Ms.
Drioli stated she concurred there should be a policy or guidelines in place.
However, she expressed concern if not written properly the policy could
be a hindrance. She felt it was not
necessary to have the policy in place before approving the video camera
purchases.
In
response to a question raised by Mr. Mecleary, Dr. Bowman explained the video
cameras would be rotated among the District’s buses at the discretion of the
Director of Transportation. All
parents and students must be advised of the rotation of video cameras in buses.
Dr.
Frank stated the use of video cameras in the buses will help set a limit as far
as student behavior is concerned. Mrs.
Butville inquired if a special education student is caught on camera destroying
a bus seat, will the student be held responsible. Mr. Wilson stated a special education student would be held
responsible for any criminal act.
Mrs.
Bostwick recommended the procedures/guideline be in place within three months.
Dr. Bowman advised the Board procedures/guidelines could be
presented to the Board at the October Work Session.
Mr.
Eccles felt he was being rushed into making a decision on the video camera
issue, and stated at this time he could not make a decision.
Mr. Stack noted the issue was also discussed at the August Work Session
and the Board was provided with additional information.
Mr.
Paradise explained at this time he did not know exactly how many cameras and
black boxes could be purchased with the budgeted $4,500.
Once more detailed cost information is available, the Board will be
advised of the exact number of video cameras that will be purchased.
After
further discussion, it was determined the majority of Board members supported
the purchase of the video cameras and black boxes for use on the buses.
The administration will begin installing the black boxes in the buses,
the appropriate notification to students and parents will be prepared and the
guidelines will be presented to the Board for review at the October Work
Session. The notification to
students and parents will include an abbreviated set of guidelines.
The
Board concurred with Mr. Stack’s recommendation that the installation of video
cameras in the buses be viewed as a pilot program and the program be reviewed
again at the end of the school year.
c. Distance
Learning
Information
distributed prior to meeting. Dr.
Bowman noted additional information has been provided regarding the Central
Susquehanna Intermediate Unit providing a Distance Learning Program.
He explained Neshaminy has students who enroll in learning centers, take
courses, submit their grades and the District accepts those courses.
Some students might fail a course, take the course in another school
district’s summer school, provide the appropriate documentation, take the
appropriate test and receive credit for the course.
Dr.
Bowman inquired if the Board wants to provide Neshaminy students the opportunity
to take a course through the Intermediate Unit’s Distance Learning Program and
include it on the students’ high school transcripts.
The students would pay for the course.
The distance learning courses would not supplant their high school
graduation requirements. The program has been approved by the Pennsylvania
Department of Education. The program could be piloted for a year to see if any
students will take advantage of the opportunity.
Ms. Drioli recommended the program be piloted for more than a year so
students can become acquainted with the program.
Mr.
Schoenstadt noted sometimes due to scheduling conflicts, students cannot enroll
in Advanced Placement courses. He
inquired if the students could enroll in a Distance Learning Advance Placement
course and receive credit for the course. Dr.
Bowman noted of the four Advanced Placement courses offered through the
Intermediate Unit, three are also offered at Neshaminy High School. He indicated
he would not be opposed to students taking a Distance Learning Advanced
Placement course if there were a scheduling conflict at the high school.
He noted it is a very rigorous program, but it is an option for students.
There would be no on-site teacher available to the students.
Mrs. Butville inquired how many high school students were not able to
enroll in Advanced Placement courses due to scheduling conflicts.
Mrs. Butville indicated she would rather see more course offerings of
subjects which Neshaminy does not offer at the high school.
Ms.
Drioli pointed out that the Poquessing Middle School now has Channel One, which
means the school now has the ability to bring into the classroom or a large
group setting distance learning.
Dr.
Bowman advised the Board that some certified staff members take accredited
on-line courses. Individuals can earn undergraduate degrees totally online.
It is not for everyone, because it is not an easy way to acquire credits.
There is no interaction with an instructor.
Dr.
Bowman recommended the program start out small. He noted quality students will be taking the courses.
The program is state approved and with an Intermediate Unit.
The cost per course is $240, which makes the program affordable.
The students would pay the cost of the course.
After
further discussion, there was Board consensus to pilot the program.
d. Facilities/Enrollment
Study
School
District Report of Facility and Enrollment Data and Enrollment Projections
Report distributed at the meeting. Dr.
Bowman advised the Board that the Pennsylvania Economy League will provide data
after the October 1 enrollment count is officially completed in the District.
The data will provide projections for five to ten years and will provide
data by grade and buildings. Dr. Bowman
reviewed the report entitled, “School District Report of Facility and
Enrollment Data”. The enrollment
data included in the report is as of September 12, 2000 and the classroom count
was the program as of last spring. See
report for facilities and enrollment information.
Dr. Bowman reviewed the Enrollment Projections Report, which was
developed by the Pennsylvania Department of Education and updated as of June
2000. The data reflects all of the
Vocational-Technical students who were in the District last year.
Historical data and not current data was used to develop the enrollment
projections. When the Pennsylvania
Economy League Report is received, the Board will have a much better grasp on
the enrollment and capacity issues.
Dr.
Bowman noted the modular classrooms have an impact upon capacity.
Mr. Paradise explained the District’s modular classrooms are 12 to 13
years old and 15 to 16 years old. Funds
have been expended to maintain the 18 modular classrooms.
When purchased, it was never the intention of the District to keep the
modular classrooms this long. A
cost projection as to the maintenance and operation costs of the modular
classrooms was not available.
Dr.
Bowman stated in October, when the report is received, the Board will need to
decide how it wants to approach the review of the report.
It could be reviewed by the Board as a whole, Board Committee,
administration or community group. He
noted in the spring, the Board had discussed including the facilities/enrollment
study as a part of the strategic plan. He
recommended the facilities/enrollment study not be included as a part of the
strategic plan. Due to the nature
of the strategic plan, it will take too long.
It is a separate issue.
Dr.
Bowman said the question to be answered is how will the District accommodate all
of its students the next five to ten years, provide the students with the
quality of programs that are in place now and as economically as possible.
Mr.
Stack stated the facilities/enrollment study will be an important consideration
for the Board this school year, and one which the Board will need to examine
closely. He felt the community
needs to be involved in the decision. In
the early stages, the review of the enrollment and capacity data needs to be
shared with the community. This will enable the community to provide feedback
and help the Board develop recommendations.
The Board must be cognizant of the fact it cannot let the issue wait.
Action must be taken immediately. Mr.
Stack recommended a committee be established consisting of three Board members
and a representative and alternate from each of the middle and elementary
schools which would be selected by the PTO leadership.
Ms. Drioli recommended the high school community also be represented on
the committee. Dr. Bowman stated
even though the high school does not have a PTO, there are several active high
school groups that could select a representative. Dr. Frank suggested the committee be an ongoing committee and
not just an ad hoc committee. Dr.
Bowman recommended the committee be charged with a given task.
Mr.
Schoenstadt felt the committee should focus specifically on the current issue
and consist of a group of high quality, committed individuals.
He noted the individuals who served on the Act 50 Committee were of
high quality, committed and provided very valuable and specific information
which helped the Board make decisions it had to make.
He felt community involvement will be critical, because some of the
decisions that must be made are very important.
Based on the recommendations of the committee, a lot of paradigms that
are used today will be changed. In
five
to
six years the biggest problem will probably be tax pressures.
He said last year’s tax increase was the most he could, personally,
justify. If there are future tax
increases, it will be necessary to show the community that extraordinary action
and consideration has been taken by the Board to balance the tax increase
against the community’s ability to pay. Mr.
Schoenstadt felt the paradigm has to change.
The four sides of the box/paradigm consist of:
·
Programs - Curriculum and non-curriculum items
·
Certified staff and administrators
·
Support Staff
·
Facilities - Area that must be examined in
minute detail
Mr.
Schoenstadt stated the box/paradigm is a good one, but it may not work next year
or the following year. The Board
must look outside the box at alternatives.
The committee should focus on helping the Board identify the
alternatives.
Mrs.
Butville indicated she favored having a representative from each PTO serving on
the committee, because there will be a specific person in each building who can
answer questions and provide accurate information. This will help keep everyone better informed.
Ms. Drioli recommended a broad-based policy be developed to ensure that
the community will always be a part of the procedure and have an investment in
the outcome.
Mr.
Stack noted there was Board support for a committee consisting of
representatives from each of the schools, including the high school, and three
Board members. Since there will
probably be other community members interested in the issue, he recommended all
of the meetings be Public Meetings. He
encouraged community members to contact their local PTO and use the PTO as a
vehicle to express their concerns to the committee. Mr. Stack recommended the formation of the committee begin as
soon as possible and a mission be established for the committee.
The charge of the committee will be to evaluate the enrollment and
facilities information and provide the Board with a recommendation.
He requested the administration develop the language for the mission
statement. He stated the
committee’s recommendation will be non-binding.
He noted if the Board is to take any action within a year, it will have
to reach a decision by the early part of next year as to what action will be
taken. It will take several months
to put the process in place. If the
decision involves the reconfiguration of the District, the Board may want
to obtain community input on how this could be accomplished.
He felt the Board needs to be very open about what it is doing and
involve the public in all aspects of the process.
Ms.
Drioli stated she will attend the Lower Southampton School PTO Meeting, advise
the PTO of the committee being established and the PTO will be asked to appoint
a representative and alternate to the committee. Ms. Drioli volunteered to serve on the committee.
Mr. Stack requested the administration provide an appropriate resource to
the committee. He stated he will be involved and help facilitate the
committee, but not necessarily one of the three Board members serving on the
committee.
Dr.
Bowman noted the process of identifying the representatives and an alternate
from the nine elementary schools, four middle schools and high school and three
Board members will take place between now and October.
He inquired if a senior citizen should serve on the committee.
Mr. Stack stated the decision of whether to appoint a senior citizen
to the committee will be left up to the PTOs.
Dr. Bowman stated administrative resources will be identified and the
administration will review the parameters and mission of the committee.
Dr. Bowman noted an administrator needs to be identified who will be
responsible for helping facilitate the committee. Either the committee needs to identify a chairperson or the
Board President appoint a committee chairperson.
Dr. Bowman stated individuals serving on the committee will be identified
by the October Meeting.
Mr.
Stack stated the committee will need to develop a list of questions as to what
information they will need to fully evaluate facility usage now and in the
future.
6.
Items for Approval
a. National
Red Ribbon Week - October 23-27,2000
Dr.
Bowman advised the Board that the annual National Red Ribbon Week motion will be
presented at the September Public Meeting.
October 23 to October 27, 2000 has been designated as Red Ribbon Week.
b. Act
48 - Interim Plan
Information
distributed at the meeting. Dr.
Bowman advised the Board an Act 48 interim plan must be submitted.
A committee, which included Dr. Frank, community members, administrators,
teachers and representative from the business community, met on August 29.
A motion to adopt an interim plan, as presented by the committee, will be
presented at the September Public Meeting.
The District is required to identify the types of activities that the
Board will approve for Act 48 hours or credits. All District approved school workshops and out-of-district
workshops/conferences will be accepted. See
sample list of workshops distributed at the meeting.
Every inservice program provided by the District will be counted towards
the teacher requirement of 180 hours over five years. Dr. Frank stated the
committee was an excellent committee and a lot of work was accomplished.
The interim plan will be presented for Board approval at the September
Public Meeting.
c. Approval
of Bid/s and Budget Transfers
There were no bids or budget transfers to be
presented for approval.
7.
Items for Information
a. Bucks
County Technical School Senior Placement Summary
Information
distributed prior to the meeting. Dr.
Bowman briefly reviewed the placement information for the class of 2000.
The information included the following:
Total
Number of Graduates
300
Total
Graduates for Full-Time Post High School Education, Armed Forces*
103
Total
Available for Employment 197
Employed
169
Unemployed 11
*Those
students who are planning full-time post high school education or who are
entering the Armed Forces are not considered as eligible for the labor market.
b. School
Opening Update
Dr.
Bowman provided the following school opening update:
·
The Transportation Department is fine tuning transportation and
working to resolve the issues.
·
The opening of the new school year went
smoothly.
·
At Neshaminy High School, there are 70 more
students attending school than projected. Due
to the labor discussions in the Philadelphia Archdiocese, some students enrolled
in Neshaminy in anticipation of a possible teacher strike.
There will be an official student count on October 1.
·
Due to the increase in the high school
enrollment, there is a shortage of textbooks in some areas. The department chairpersons are doing a textbook count and
any needed textbooks will be ordered.
·
Staffing went well. Staff
morale is high and the teachers are excited about being back in the classroom.
The parents are enthused and supportive of education.
·
Various facility projects were performed
over the summer. A roof problem at
one of the buildings is being addressed. One
classroom is affected by the problem.
Mr.
Paradise referred to the parents who spoke at the August Meeting regarding a
transportation issue involving their son and advised the Board the issue has
been reviewed. A 25 minute improvement has been made to the student’s
schedule.
Mr.
Paradise explained he has spoken to Mrs. Cahill, parent who addressed the Board
earlier in the meeting regarding transportation issue involving Queen of the
Universe School. There has been
some improvement on the situation since the beginning of the school year and the
Transportation Department will continue to work on the issue.
He said it takes time during the beginning of the school year to fine
tune the transportation issues. It
gets more and more difficult each year. The
traffic today is very different than it was just two years ago and it has had an
enormous impact on the District’s transportation system in terms of time.
The starting and ending times of school and the communities that feed
into the schools can be controlled in District schools.
However, the District does not have this control with the parochial and
private schools. In the last two
years, the Archdiocese has allowed out of parish enrollment in the Catholic
Schools. This has had an affect on
transportation. The Transportation
Department is working to resolve the transportation issues.
Mrs.
Bostwick asked what kind of help could the parents be other than driving their
children to school each day. She
noted a number of years ago, a group of families purchased a van and were
reimbursed by their school district for its operational expenses.
Mr. Paradise stated the problem with such a situation is where would
the District begin and where would it end. Mr. Paradise explained often a shuttle system is used to
transport students, i.e. student shuttled to Maple Point School and the student
transfers to another bus which transports the student to the school.
It would be helpful and save time if the parent could take the student to
the bus transfer location (Maple Point School in the example provided).
Mr.
Eccles explained he has been inundated with calls from parents of Sandburg,
Maple Point and Queen of the Universe School students regarding transportation
issues. He inquired what transportation changes have been made this year.
Last year two buses transported students from the Quincy Hollow section
and one bus transported students from the Twin Oaks section.
He expressed concern about the number of students on the buses.
Mr. Paradise explained the bus seats are 39 inches wide and there may be
three students (grades K through 8) per seat.
There is an allocation of 13 inches per student.
Reimbursement is based upon doing this as efficiently as possible.
He noted he has also received telephone calls about long bus rides.
Mr.
Eccles pointed out there is a Queen of the Universe School transportation
problem. The school has been in the
District community over 40 years. He
said what has changed between last year and this year?
Mr. Blasch, Director of Transportation, explained a review over the
summer of the number of students being transported to the Queen of Universe
School revealed most of the buses were transporting between 30 and 35 students.
An effort was made to bring it in a little tighter to be more efficient.
It is possible it is a little too tight.
Mr. Blasch explained he has been in constant communication with the
school’s principal. The principal
has been updating him daily on the busing situation and is being very patient. Possibly one of the routes will need to be split into two
routes. Mr. Eccles pointed out the
students are arriving late for school and the bus is not at the school when
school is dismissed. Dr. Bowman
stated the District’s resources are maximized at this point and every effort
is being made to resolve the issues. The
2:30 p.m. dismissal/bus issue is being experienced at Neshaminy’s elementary
schools also. Mr. Paradise
explained a bus is not considered late unless it arrives at the school 15
minutes after dismissal time. The
bus today arrived 20 minutes after dismissal time and the Transportation
Department will do its best to improve upon the situation.
Mr.
Eccles expressed concern about the three students (13 inch allocation) per seat
guideline. Mr. Blasch
explained the new buses have a 76 student capacity.
In the middle schools the Transportation Department focuses on placing 55
to 60 students per bus. Mr. Eccles
stated in the Twin Oaks section students run from stop to stop so they can get
on the bus first to ensure they get a seat.
Mr. Blasch stated every effort is being made to resolve the
transportation issues. The District
is busing a total of 13,000 students.
8. Superintendent’s
Report
Transition
Dr.
Bowman advised the Board the administration is working on the transition at
C&I with Dr. Boccuti and Mr. Stanford at the Hoover School.
At the September Public Meeting, the appointment of an acting principal
at the Poquessing Middle School will be presented to the Board for approval.
The individual will be interviewed at 7:30 p.m. at the Tawanka Elementary
School.
Safe
School Grant
Dr.
Bowman informed the Board through the efforts of Dr. Costanzo and Mr. Wilson the
District has received a $60,000 safe school grant. The grant will allow the District to continue its Peer
Mediation Conflict Resolution Program, which was started over a year ago.
Neshaminy received the largest grant out of all the grants received in
Bucks County.
GFOA
Certification of Recognition for Budget Presentation
Information
distributed prior to the meeting. Dr.
Bowman advised the Board the District has received the Distinguished Budget
Presentation Award for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1999.
Dr. Bowman recognized the outstanding efforts of Mr. Paradise, Ms. Donovan
and Ms. Glennie.
9. Public
Comment
No
public comment was presented.
10. Committee Reports
Board
members who need their committee assignments adjusted should advise Mr. Stack.
a.
Educational Development
Committee
Mr.
Mecleary reported the agenda for the next few months is being developed.
Board members having any agenda suggestions should contact Mr. Mecleary.
b.
Educational Foundation
Mrs.
Bostwick reported the annual Dollars and Senses auction and sale will be held
November 9, 2000. The auction will
include a raffle with the prize being a weekend in New York City.
The weekend will include tickets to the show Lion King (May 5) and dinner
for two.
c.
Finance Committee
Mr.
Paradise reported a few written soda proposals have been received.
The next meeting date has not been scheduled yet.
Mrs. Butville requested the Board members be advised when the next
meeting will be held.
d.
Intermediate Unit Board
No report presented.
e.
Intermediate Unit Legislative
Committee
No report presented.
f.
Technical School Board
Mr.
Dengler reported the Technical School opened on time.
g.
Educational Policies Committee
Ms.
Drioli reported data is being gathered for the attendance policy.
Ms. Drioli recommended the committee develop a policy pertaining to
community involvement. Dr. Bowman
stated the administration will ascertain if there are any community involvement
model policies available for review.
11. Future Topics
Mr.
Stack noted the strategic plan will be a future topic.
12. Agenda Development for the September 26, 2000 Public Meeting
Agenda
items reviewed during course of the meeting.
13. Correspondence
There
was no correspondence
14. Other Board Business
Ms.
Drioli stated as a result of renovations that took place over the summer, the
Poquessing Middle School looks very nice, and the parents are pleased with the
renovations. She thanked the Board
members for their support and efforts to improve the Poquessing Middle School
facility. She reported the
Poquessing Middle School has embarked on a new program, Attitude Adjustment
Program.
Mrs.
Butville stated under the current procedure, the Board members have very little
information regarding job openings in the District. She felt the Board members should have more information on
the job openings and hirings. She
distributed a sample recommendation for hire of professional staff form, which
is used by the Bensalem School District, and sample rubric used by the Technical
School. She noted some school
districts provide a full resume of the candidates. She felt having more candidate information will allow the
Board members to make a more informed choice.
Mr. Schoenstadt stated interview forms, etc. are available on the
Internet. Mr. Stack requested the
Board review the information distributed and it be an item for future
discussion.
Mrs.
Butville advised the Board she will be attending the PSBA/PASA Conference, which
is being held October 17 to 20. While
at the conference, she will attend the PSBA Legislative Council Meeting.
Mrs.
Butville explained she received three telephone calls regarding family
members’ attendance at sports functions.
Previously, families could purchase a family pass.
Now parents have to pay the full price to see their children participate
in school sports events. Dr. Bowman
explained a few years ago a family pass was instituted.
A family could purchase a family pass, which entitled all family members
to attend sports events. Since the
family pass was being abused, it was discontinued.
One family would hand the pass to another family.
Thereby, more than one family were entering the events at a reduced rate
on one pass. Dr. Bowman stated the
administration will review the family pass issue again.
Mr. Stack
announced an Executive Session will be held following the Work Session to
discuss personnel issues.
Mr. Stack
adjourned the meeting at 10:15 p.m. An
Executive Session was held.
Respectfully
submitted,
Carol A. Calvello
Board Secretary |