The
Neshaminy Board of School Directors met in public session on May 8,
2001 at the Maple Point Middle School.
The following persons were in attendance:
BOARD MEMBERS:
|
ADMINISTRATORS:
|
Mr.
Edward Stack, President
|
Dr.
Gary Bowman
|
Mr.
Steven Schoenstadt, Vice President
|
Dr.
Raymond Boccuti
|
Mrs.
Yvonne Butville
|
Mr.
Harry Jones
|
Mr.
Harry Dengler, Jr.
|
Mr.
Richard Marotto
|
Ms.
Carol Drioli
Mr. Richard Eccles |
Mr.
Joseph Paradise
Mr. P. Howard Wilson |
Dr.
Ruth Frank
George Mecleary, Jr., Esq. |
Mr.
Bruce Wyatt
|
BOARD MEMBER NOT PRESENT:
Mrs. June Bostwick
|
OTHERS: Approximately
200 persons from the public, staff and press |
|
|
SECRETARY:
Mrs. Carol
Calvello
|
|
Call to Order
- Mr. Stack called the
meeting to order at 8:05 p.m.
Pledge of Allegiance
- Mr. Stack requested that
those in attendance join in the salute to the flag.
Announcement
- Mr. Stack announced Mrs.
Bostwick was absent from the meeting due to illness.
He stated the Board would listen to public input and there
would be no Board comment at the meeting.
Public Comment
- There was a two minute time
limit per speaker. Ms.
Faust, Hoover School PTO President, thanked the Board for listening
to the community members� comments and coming to a decision that
educationally means something to the Hoover School students, staff
and community members. She
stated throughout the District, residents feel the Neshaminy schools
are superior to the other schools in the surrounding area.
She urged the Board to continue to listen throughout the
whole decision making process.
Ms. Faust stated the first priority should be the educational
value for the children. Keep
in mind the well educated children of today will be the leaders of
tomorrow.
Ms.
Carr, Langhorne, explained she is a guidance counselor in a
neighboring school district. She
stated developmentally the center of the middle school student�s
life is not home and family. It is the school. The
school is not bricks and mortar.
It is the student�s step toward independence and a sense of
safety. Parents and
educators want students to reach for independence with that sense of
safety. As a community
and nation, we have spent the last two years involved with school
safety issues. It seems
inconceivable to consider compromising the middle school sense of
safety and well being. From
literature and experience as parents, it is known that a student who
feels safe is most able to learn.
Adolescence can be an isolating time.
Moving students out of a well defined school community at
this critical middle school age will heighten the feeling of
isolation and disorientation for all students involved.
Middle school is where many future behaviors and attitudes
are forever formed. Can
a millage be put on that?
Ms.
Carr referred to Philip Weinstein�s, consulting psychologist for
the District, comments that young adolescents have a difficult time
with social change. Groups and friendships are most important to the middle
school children and often these groups are exclusive to
�outsiders�. It
would be most difficult for a middle school child to be uprooted
from his or her school. Neshaminy Middle School students would be perceived as the
�outsiders�. Ms.
Carr said for the sake of the development of our young adolescents
do not close or change the composition of any of the middle schools
in the School District. Our
students� developmental needs must be paramount.
Ms.
Pennypacker, Neshaminy Federation of Teachers Vice President, asked
as the Board examines a timeline to change the status quo for the
fall of 2002, it hold the hearings during the school year when
community members are present, and not in the summer when people are
traveling or are on vacation. She
urged the Board to listen to its constituents and staff throughout
the entire ordeal. She cautioned the Board to not allow itself to be
accused of going back on its promise and making decisions without
the presence of the community.
Well attended meetings will allow for the dialogue,
information sharing and public input necessary for the Board to make
the most educationally sound decisions on the most crucial matters.
Ms.
Pavonarius, Levittown, explained she and her family moved to the
area six years ago. One
of the main reasons for moving to the area was having a school
within walking distance of their home, the Schweitzer School.
Since starting to attend the Schweitzer School this year,
there have been amazing changes and growth in her son.
She expressed concern this may be lost if a decision is made
to close the Schweitzer School.
She urged the Board to review every possible option,
including closing all modulars, closing the Eisenhower building and
redistricting before closing any schools.
Ms.
Berue, Langhorne, advised the Board she has analyzed the modular
information listed on the District’s web page.
She provided the following information regarding modular
usage:
Buck School - $19,000 Per Use
Everitt School - $21,000 Per Use
4 Regular Classrooms
1 Regular Classroom
1 Academically Enriched
Classrooms
1 Instrumental Music
Classroom
Heckman School - $19,000 Per Use
Lower Southampton School - $21,000 Per Use
1 Specials
1 Academically Enriched Classroom
1 Instrumental Music
Classroom
1 Storage
2 Storage
1 PTO Store
1 After School Child Care
Program
Ferderbar School - $21,000 Per Use
Sandburg School - $19,500 Per Use
1 Academically Enriched
Classroom
2 Regular Classrooms
1 Title I Classroom
2 Academically Enriched Classrooms
Ms.
Berue requested the Board examine closer the cost and continued use
of the modular classrooms. She
felt if the Board and community worked hard enough, they could
arrive at a reasonable solution.
Ms.
Lohff, Neshaminy employee and resident, explained her son, who is in
college, had attended the Neshaminy Middle School, and it was his
best school experience of all the schools he attended.
She would like her daughter, who is currently a fourth
grader, to have the same experience as her son.
She explained she feels very frustrated after the Board
Meetings, because she does not have any answers to her questions.
At some point, she would like the community members to be
able to ask questions and receive answers from the Board members.
She said is there an offer on the table from the Council Rock
School District for the Neshaminy Middle School?
If the District becomes a landlord, will tax money be used to
maintain the building?
Have the Board members made up their minds on the school
closing issue? She said
there are so many things in life that can be taken away from us.
The only thing no one can take away is our education.
Don’t lessen the children’s educational experience and
not make it the best experience Neshaminy children can have.
Mr.
Schieber, Langhorne, presented to the Board a petition with over 200
signatures of Middletown Township residents.
He noted the signatures were not obtained through a
door-to-door solicitation, but the signatures were obtained at the
Villages of Flowers Mill clubhouse.
The petition states the following:
We,
the undersigned residents of Middletown Township, support the
Neshaminy School Board members in their efforts to reduce the costs
of operating the system. We
urge the Board to decide the schools to be closed in the most
expeditious manner. We
further urge you to petition the Pennsylvania Department of
Education to allow implementation of the selected closings in
September 2001.
Mr.
Schieber pointed out senior citizens do not have the same earning
potential as the younger generations.
Most are on fixed incomes.
Some senior citizens are paying school taxes in the $3,000 to
$6,000 range. Sometimes this is being done on an income of less than
$20,000. Some seniors
who only have social security to rely on could be spending more than
30 percent of their modest income on school taxes alone.
It does not take long before it affects their standard of
living. Decisions
between health care costs, diets and modest entertainment, such as
movies, are compromised. He
noted today there was a letter to the editor in the Courier Times
written by a person who has to borrow money to pay property taxes.
It will not take long before the only other option would be
to sell the property and move to a less expensive community.
Mr.
Schieber pointed out some members of the community want more time to
study and debate the issues before the decisions are made.
At a past meeting, it was stated the issue has been under
study for at least a year. It
did not take long to negotiate a long term teachers contract.
Why does this issue, which could save the community a
$1,000,000 a year, require more time for study and discussion?
He stated he has spoken to many non-senior citizens and they
are of the same mind about controlling spending for the schools.
More often than not, they admit the taxes are too high and
spending is out of control. Close
the schools in the other neighborhoods, not mine, seems to be the
cry. He said watch what
you wish for, because you might get it.
The next generation will come after your property.
Ms.
Hyjorick, Highland Park, stated the District is providing the
children with programs that are the best.
We are doing something right.
Why change it? There
must be a better way to resolve the issue.
We are educating our children today and investing in the
future.
Ms.
Hyjorick criticized Mr. Stack for stating at the May 1 Board Meeting
that he was not necessarily committed to housing the Intermediate
Unit classes. She said
the Board has an obligation to all of the District’s students.
There must be a viable solution.
Moving the children around will not work.
It will upset the children and force them to adapt.
The District has fantastic programs.
However, if the teachers trained to teach the programs are
transferred to another area and/or age level, it will not work. It will be money wasted.
She urged the Board to find a solution that will benefit
everyone, including the senior citizens.
Ms.
McGuckin, Langhorne, urged the Board to make the choice that causes
the least amount of disruption possible.
She requested the Board vote in August on the school closing
issue. She explained
the last couple of months have been difficult and time consuming.
She said if the Board votes in August, we will have the
entire year not to contemplate on how to save all the schools, but
concentrate on making the best possible transition easier.
Ms.
Goldstein, Langhorne, explained her two adult children graduated
from Neshaminy. Her
children attended three Neshaminy elementary schools and her oldest
child attended two high schools.
Her children went on to college to further their education.
Switching schools did not harm her children, because she and
her husband supported their children and emphasized the positive
aspects of the changes. Because the parents were positive, the students were
positive. She urged the
parents to think of all the students who have been transferred to
different schools over the years and have not been damaged by the
changes. The teachers are good teachers and will continue to teach,
but possibly at a different school than their current school. She
said you are not married to a building.
You are married to an educational system.
Mr.
Truchil, Langhorne Borough, stressed the importance of keeping all
middle schools in the District open.
He stated there is evidence indicating that middle school
children are at a critical age.
Educational literature suggests the greatest behavioral
problems for schools are in the middle schools.
The problems that children may have later in life begin at
the middle school age. It
would behoove the Board to keep all middle schools open.
Packing middle school children into three schools and
dramatically decreasing the opportunities of students to participate
in school plays, athletic teams, musical groups, student government
and other extra-curricular activities would only contribute to a
recipe for problems. Creating
more alienated middle school students in crowded buildings with
proportionately fewer extra-curricular activities would only
contribute to the problem.
Mr.
Truchil distributed to the Board members a letter from Kenneth
Barnes, Langhorne Borough Chief of Police (attachment I), that
addresses his serious concerns about closing a middle school.
Mr. Truchil stated given the national media attention to
alienated youths in schools, where one stands on this issue becomes
critical. He said what
does the Board consider to be the millage equivalent to having a
more positive environment in its cost saving ventures? He noted educators, psychologists, police, and the Courier
Times editorial staff have said the middle school program should
not be changed. He
stated he has not heard any substantive educational rationale from
anyone that legitimates closing any middle school in Neshaminy while
keeping its commitment to the education and social development of
our children.
Ms.
Finson, Levittown, explained she attended Neshaminy Schools.
Her elementary school, the Eisenhower School, was closed. She attended Maple Point High School, which was closed and
later reopened as a middle school.
If the Neshaminy Middle School is closed, the Board will be
closing her third District alma mater.
She pointed out everyone living in the District, including
the senior citizens, are a part of the community.
What the senior citizens need is what everyone needs as a
community. She said
when the senior citizens went to school, someone paid and supported
them. If a school is
closed, she will explain the situation to her children in the most
positive way and support and help them through the transition.
However, she will fight to keep all of the schools open.
Mr.
Schneider, Langhorne, explained an acquaintance of his, who is not a
senior citizen, is an asset to the community and has two children
attending Neshaminy schools. If
his taxes increase another $500 over the next few years, he will
have to move. He said
if this man and his
family have to move from their house, in the District, which one of
you will be able to say you were acting in their best interest?
Ms.
Henry, Langhorne, explained she selected the Neshaminy School
District over the Council Rock School District because of the
quality of the education and the cost.
Her daughter is a seventh grader at Neshaminy Middle School.
She is a John Hopkins Scholar and is extremely bright.
Her daughter has said if the Neshaminy Middle School is
closed when she is to go into eighth grade, she will go to Villa
(private school). She
is concerned she will lose ninth grade making the transition to
another middle school and lose tenth grade making the transition to
the high school. Ms. Henry explained her mother, who is deceased,
had happily paid Neshaminy School District taxes when she was a
senior citizen and was happy to see children getting a good
education that her children could not get in a public school system.
Ms. Henry said if Neshaminy Middle School is closed, she will
be forced to move her daughter into an exclusive environment
(private school). She
urged the Board to find another way to resolve the issue other than
opening and closing schools. She
said where is the District’s long term planning?
Eight years is not long term planning.
Mr.
Cohen, Schweitzer School teacher, stated the School Board has a
legacy to consider. Each
school that is being threatened with closure has its own individual
strengths that are an integral part of Neshaminy and will lessen the
District’s ability to educate its children.
He noted the parents are a unified group opposed to closing
any school. The Board
members are elected to represent the regions encompassing the
schools. He felt the
consensus seems to be that the majority of the Board’s
constituents do not want the Board to close any school.
If the Board members representing each region vote to close a
school in their region, they are not representing the people who
elected them. Mr. Cohen
stated fiscal responsibility is an important issue, but not as
important as ethical and educational responsibility. He referred to option one of the Educational Impact Report
(realign attendance boundaries to eliminate building closures, while
decreasing class size, removing modulars and balancing building
usage levels) and urged the Board to cut expenses where there is no
educational impact. He
said the Board’s constituents have indicated the tax increase,
$1.92 to $3.84 per week, necessary to keep the schools open is
pocket change that the constituents are willing to spend to keep the
schools open. He urged
the Board to not ignore the consensus of the constituents.
Ms.
Sanginitti, Our Lady of Grace Home and School President, stated she
sends her children to Catholic School and pays taxes to the
District. She said she
does not want to see the residents’ schools closed.
She wants accountability for the tax dollars spent.
She pointed out the District will be receiving taxes from the
new Villages of Flowers Mill housing development and none of the
residents living in the development will be sending children to the
District’s schools. Where
is the money going? Where
are the tax dollars being wasted?
If a school is closed, how will it affect busing?
There is a problem with busing now.
The District currently does not have enough drivers.
She suggested some of the programs that are a waste of tax
dollars be eliminated and the Board stop increasing the taxes.
Mr.
O’Connor, Langhorne, felt two critical issues were missing from
the facility and enrollment information packet dated May 1, which
are as follows:
Class
Size - Particularly in grades
K to 5. Every study and
article related to class size suggests average class size should
range between 15 and 18 students.
All
Day Kindergarten - Members of
the Board have said to him one reason public schools lose enrollment
to the charter schools is they tend to offer all day kindergarten.
Mr.
O’Connor felt the time for both of these initiatives has come and
encouraged the Board to consider reduced class size and all day
kindergarten as they examine the issue of a possible school closing.
He expressed concern that too many people are not viewing
this issue with the best interest of the entire community in
mind. As a taxpayer, he
would hate to see his taxes go up.
As a father of four Neshaminy students, he would hate to see
a school closed and have one of his children forced to switch to
another school unexpectedly. Increased
taxes are needed to meet the needs of the schools.
With some building improvement issues ever lingering,
especially at the high school, the school tax will probably increase
each year. He stated he
moved his family to the area 15 years ago because of the Neshaminy
School District. He
recognized value then and he is not about to turn his back on the
community when more money is needed now.
Mr.
O’Connor said as far as saving schools, the best anyone can do as
a parent to educate their children is prepare them for change.
He explained while he understands why parents want their
children to remain in the same school as they are in now, he does
not comprehend why it is automatically assumed any change will
necessarily be a bad one. We are teaching our children to fight change at a time in our
history when the most successful and happy people in life are the
ones that anticipate change, not the ones that fear it.
Mr. O’Connor extended a vote of confidence and thanks
to the Board. He noted
many in the public have criticized the Board for considering a
school closure. He said
I may not agree with what the Board wants to do, but believe the
Board must ask all the right questions before it can ever arrive at
the correct answer.
Ms.
Beck, Neshaminy Middle School PTO Vice President, pointed out a form
is available at the Middletown Township building for property tax
assistance for senior citizens. Since
1977 rebates totaling more than $1,000,000 have been paid by the
School District with over 200 senior citizens participating last
year. At the same
location, a Pennsylvania property tax or rent rebate form is
available. She said she
does sympathize with the situation of individuals on a fixed income.
However, any community with a good school system, will
require the residents to pay higher taxes.
Ms.
Beck referred to comments made earlier in the meeting regarding
children previously having gone through school changes and
succeeding. She said
unfortunately, today is a very changed society. We are not living the way we did ten years ago.
Violence is climbing in society and we do not want that to
happen in Neshaminy.
Ms.
Martinez, Langhorne, stated at a previous Board Meeting one of the
Board members questioned why more residents were not attending the
meetings. She said she
had never previously attended a Board Meeting because she never felt
strongly about any School District issues. She stated she is very upset that the Board is considering
closing any of the Neshaminy schools and does not understand why the
Board is considering closing the Neshaminy Middle School. She felt the Board members have already made up their minds
about the issue. She
said is there more the community members should know about that it
has not been made aware of? Has
the Board streamlined the budget?
Are the capacity facts accurate?
The parents have the power of the students, teachers and
principals behind them. She
suggested the School Board and parents, students, teachers and
principals join forces and put pressure on the state legislators to
obtain the needed funding, and invite the legislators to the Board
Meetings. She urged the
Board, parents, students, teachers and principals to put all their
energy into obtaining the necessary funding from the legislators and
keep all of the schools open.
Board Comment
- After a brief discussion,
there was Board consensus to allow Board comment.
Each Board member was limited to two minutes.
Mr. Eccles explained the last few Sundays he has spent time
in school yards meeting with parents and children.
It has been an eye opening experience.
He stated we presently have a community in crisis.
The crisis center is our local community schools, our
children and their individual educational experiences.
I have heard from many people who have voiced their concerns
over the situation. Many
folks have severe tax issues facing them. Folks on fixed incomes face the dilemma of choosing between
paying for health insurance or losing their homes. Many people have stated that they would not mind a tax
increase to keep our neighborhood schools open.
Some folks find peace in knowing that their children attend a
safe, educationally challenging, neighborhood school. One thing is for sure, we are a community.
We are a strong, vocal community.
A community that stands behind a cause, stands up when
something they believe in is in jeopardy or someone needs our help.
We have shown through the years that our neighborhoods, our
communities, help one another when needed.
We need strong schools.
Schools that challenge our children every day of the week.
We need schools that support our community educationally,
culturally and athletically. We
need the best. We need the best and brightest educators and I know we have
them. We do not have to
settle for anything less. Our
children are our future. We
know that.
Mr.
Eccles explained he is submitting an alternative proposal.
He stated maybe Neshaminy can find a way to become a model to
other communities who are faced with the same issues.
What is more important our children’s education or a
balanced budget? We are
at a crossroad. Which
way do we turn? Do we
ask the community to pay higher taxes to support our schools, the
education of our children, our future, our community’s future?
Can we help our senior citizens with some tax relief?
Can we ask our educators, administrators and support staff to
help in this very noble cause?
Think for a moment. Let
your mind envision the best, the brightest.
After all, we are Neshaminy.
Mr. Eccles presented the following alternate proposal to
school closings:
·
Every school should remain open.
·
Reduce class size more than contractual obligations.
·
Increase learning and test scores with more teacher
interaction.
·
Small class sizes with more educational opportunities.
·
Become a model in the state and country.
·
Remove modular units
·
Get realistic bids on moving modular units or have volunteers
remove them.
·
Freeze senior citizens’ taxes or raise income levels from
the state to show a smaller increase with the help of our
legislators.
·
Allow senior citizens to make monthly or quarterly payments
on taxes with no penalties.
·
A 10 percent reduction in pay and benefits from all Neshaminy
employees.
·
A 10 percent reduction in all non-educational activities and
general belt tightening in the annual budget.
·
Open an alternative school for our children.
·
Provide a better educational experience and save the
taxpayers money.
Mr.
Schoenstadt congratulated Mr. Eccles on his proposal.
He said it is innovative and creative.
However, it is grossly impractical.
It does not take into consideration the fact that the Board
negotiated contracts with all of the employees. There would have to be an extended negotiation and probably
unsuccessful negotiations. If
the class size is reduced by an average of three additional
students, the Board will triple the amount of money it will have to
go back to the taxpayers for to pay for the class size reduction.
He stated if the proposal were practical, he would be able to
support some of the features of it.
The fact is that the Board has a responsibility, charged to
the Board by the state legislators, to be fiscally responsible.
To realize that the community loves their schools is
wonderful. I love all of the schools.
If the Board could keep all of the schools open, reduce class
size by an additional three students, freeze the senior citizens’
taxes at the current level and never have to raise them again that
would be wonderful. It
would also be illegal.
Mr.
Schoenstadt said he understands the concerns of the parents of the
students. The Board is
holding the hearings to try and identify all of the alternatives
available and reach a decision.
The Board is reviewing all the options including closing the
modular units, which will cost approximately $500,000.
He indicated he would like to see the option of having
volunteers remove the modular units at no cost.
It does not save the District money.
It just keeps the District from having to lay out money.
Most of the options presented by Mr. Eccles are not practical
and not legally practical.
Mr.
Dengler explained he recently met with the legislators and senators
in Harrisburg and was told not to look to the state for money.
State revenues are down the first quarter $53,000,000.
The state’s $200,000,000 surplus is shrinking away fast. Due to the turndown in the economy, the sales tax is much
less than they anticipated. Additional
money will not be available from Harrisburg.
Ms.
Drioli said one of the reasons the children are receiving such a
good education is because they have good parenting.
She said you are a group of fine parents who are fighting for
your children. When
this is all said and done, I hope the community members direct their
attention to Harrisburg. She
suggested the community members ask their legislators to freeze the
taxes on senior citizens’ property.
This is something only those in Harrisburg can do.
This would address the needs of the mature adults who have
been living in the District for the last 30 to 40 years.
She said she is not suggesting the senior citizens not pay
taxes, but that their taxes be frozen at some point after they
retire. A large group
needs to go to Harrisburg and lobby for the change.
Ms.
Drioli explained she is the residents’ elected representative.
Even though she may not agree with it, she will vote on the
issue the way she feels the residents would like her to vote.
She pointed out the District is built out and there is no
land available for development to generate more income.
If one of the schools is closed and later reopened, there
would be a renovation cost associated with the reopening of the
school, because the schools being considered for closure are in need
of renovations. She
emphasized the fact that the Board members have not made up their
minds on the issue.
Mrs.
Butville explained in the negotiated contract, lower class size was
one of the items approved. There
will be fewer students per class at the elementary level.
If a school is closed, there will not be larger classes.
Mrs. Butville stated she has not made up her mind on the
issue. She pointed out
if the Board were to approve just redistricting, there would not be
any more students to fill the empty spaces and
students would still be transferred to different schools,
different environments. The
children redistricted would have to face the same issues students
would have had to face if a school were closed.
She explained there is a $16,000 income limit on the senior
citizen tax rebate. She
advised the public a Board Meeting will be held following the Public
Input Meeting and the Board will be receiving more information.
Mr.
Mecleary stated it is his understanding that for every teacher that
retires and is not replaced, there is a savings to the District of
approximately $50,000. If 22 teachers retire and do not have to be replaced because
of declining enrollment, it would amount to $1,000,000. As the student population declines, not replacing the
retiring teachers will allow the District to continue to save money
without closing schools.
Dr.
Frank stated she is still opposed to closing schools and changing
programs.
Mr.
Stack referred to a question raised earlier in the meeting, and
explained a letter has been received from the Council Rock School
District’s Superintendent, Dr. Kirby, in which he expressed
interest in potentially being able to lease a middle school facility
in the Neshaminy School District.
Mr.
Stack announced a Public Board Meeting will be held on May 22 and
public comment will be solicited at the meeting.
Mr.
Schoenstadt moved the meeting be adjourned and Mrs. Butville
seconded the motion. The Board approved the motion with eight ayes.
Mr. Stack adjourned the meeting at 9:15 p.m.
A Public Board Meeting was held following the Public Input
Meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Carol A. Calvello
Board Secretary
|