The
Neshaminy Board of School Directors met in public session on
March 13, 2001 in the Board Room of the District Offices,
Maple Point Middle School.
The following persons were in attendance:
BOARD
MEMBERS:
|
ADMINISTRATORS:
|
Mr.
Edward Stack, President
|
Dr.
Gary Bowman
|
Mr.
Steven Schoenstadt, Vice President
|
Dr.
Raymond Boccuti
|
Mrs.
June Bostwick
|
Mr.
Harry Jones
|
Mrs.
Yvonne Butville
|
Mr.
Richard Marotto
|
Mr.
Richard Eccles
Dr.
Ruth Frank*
|
Mr.
P. Howard Wilson
Mr.
Bruce Wyatt
|
George
Mecleary, Jr., Esq.
|
SOLICITOR:
|
BOARD
MEMBERS NOT PRESENT:
Mr.
Harry Dengler, Jr.
Ms. Carol Drioli
|
Robert
R. Fleck, Esq.
|
|
OTHERS: Approximately 100
persons from the public, staff and press
|
SECRETARY:
|
|
Mrs.
Carol Calvello
|
|
*Left
meeting at 9:30 p.m.
|
|
Prior to
the Public Board Meeting, a Board Information Meeting was held
to review the tentative contract agreement with the Neshaminy
Federation of Teachers. Public
comment was heard at the Board Information Meeting.
1.
Call to Order
Mr. Stack called the meeting to order at 8:30 p.m.
2.
Pledge
of Allegiance
Mr.
Stack requested that those in attendance join in the salute to
the flag.
3.
Announcement
Mr. Stack announced Ms. Drioli was absent due to a
scheduling conflict.
4.
Board Comment
Mrs. Bostwick stated she was pleased to see so many members
of the public in attendance at the meeting. She stated during a controversial issue is not the time to
become community active.
The Board could have used the community members’
encouragement and direction the last several years.
She encouraged the community members to be more
concerned about how the District is run throughout the year
and not just at the last minute when an issue comes up.
Mrs. Bostwick referred to the proposed contract with the
NFT (Neshaminy Federation of Teachers) and explained some of
the Board members do not like what is included in the proposed
contract, but what was first offered was worse.
The proposed contract is the best agreement that could
be reached between the two groups.
She stated having seen a strike and having avoided one
several years ago, she would prefer not to face a strike
again. A strike
hurts the children.
Mr. Mecleary stated during the last contract negotiation,
four to five years ago, the best medical plan that could be
purchased was in place. When
that contract went into effect, the plan was changed to a less
expensive plan. Under
the proposed contract, the NFT has agreed to open up the
current contract and bring the District additional savings for
the current year in the area of medical plan costs.
In the last two years of the proposed new contract,
there will be an even lower medical plan. The NFT has been helpful and cooperative.
Mr. Mecleary said he is very sympathetic to the
situation of senior citizens on fixed incomes.
He pointed out when the senior citizens’ children
were attending school, senior citizens at that time were
paying taxes to help fund education.
Mrs. Butville said she was glad to see the large public
turnout and would like to see the public attend the Board
Meetings more often. She
explained the first contract offered was not nearly as good as
the contract being presented for approval.
The Board has worked with the NFT to reach a better
contract. Having
a strike hurts the students.
She said the Board understands the situation of the
senior citizens on fixed incomes, and wants to deal with
alleviating some of the taxes impacting senior citizens.
Part of the issue involves getting Harrisburg to return
more money to the school districts.
The District does not receive nearly the amount of
state reimbursement for education as the District did when the
senior citizens’ children were attending school.
The District receives back only a very small portion of
every dollar it sends to Harrisburg.
The Board is trying to deal with this problem.
The senior citizens could help the Board in this area
by putting pressure on the legislators in Harrisburg.
She noted Representative Wright has held several
information meetings.
Mrs. Butville explained one of the issues reviewed by a Tax
Advisory Committee was an earned income tax. It was determined the earned income tax was not a good
option. Since
Lower Bucks County’s location is so close to Philadelphia
and New York City, a number of residents work and already pay
a wage tax to the two cities. Due to the way
the laws are written, Neshaminy would not be able to collect
an earned income tax from those residents working in
Philadelphia and New York City.
Therefore, the District would lose a portion of its
real estate tax revenue and not be able to collect an earned
income tax from a portion of the residents.
An earned income tax would not help the District.
She felt the proposed contract is the best that was
offered and is best for the students.
Mrs. Butville noted the Board has been discussing the issue
of declining enrollment, will continue to review the issue and
make a decision in a few months.
The decision resulting from the declining enrollment
review should provide some additional relief.
Hopefully, the proposed teacher salary increase will be
offset by some of the other reductions that will take place in
the District.
Dr. Frank pointed out all study committees that the Board
has had and will have are open to the public, and it is always
announced in the newspaper.
Mr. Eccles noted it is important to never lose sight of our
future and our future is our children.
He said we need to ensure the children have a bright
future and receive a good education.
He pointed out that the Board members are not paid for
serving on the Board. The
Board members volunteer to do the job.
The Board wants to build a strong community and provide
the children every opportunity they can have.
This will be accomplished by having great teachers in
the District. He
said Neshaminy has the best educators, administrators and
community. It is
the price we have to pay.
It is not an easy decision.
We must always remember the future.
The future is our children.
Mr. Stack explained when he came on the School Board eight
years ago, his principle interest/concern was property taxes.
In an effort to have some impact on legislators, he
served on the Legislative Committee.
When the state passed the Homestead Exemption, it
opened the door to reduce the tax rates for residents without
having to lower the tax rates for commercial establishments.
As a result of this effort, the state passed Act 50.
Act 50 was the enabling legislation that provided the
opportunity for the School District to expand an earned income
tax from 1 percent to 1.5 percent.
After reviewing the legislation, it was clear in four
or five years the earned income tax would not make up the
revenue difference, and the Board would have to revert back to
increasing property taxes.
Therefore, it was not a solution for the Neshaminy
School District. A Tax Advisory Committee reviewed the issue.
Mr. Stack said the issue is not the contract with the
NFT.
It is the funding of education.
The way education is funded today is wrong and needs to
be changed. The Board has curtailed some of the increases.
The salary increases included in the proposed contract
and previous two contracts are significantly lower than those
provided in the prior ten to twenty years.
The proposed contract includes a consumer price index
increase, 2.75 percent. A
significant aspect of the contract proposal is the help the
District will receive in the area of health care benefit
costs. The NFT
has worked with the Board to open the existing contract and
assisted the Board with health care benefit costs in the last
year of the existing contract, which will result in a $290,000
savings.
Mr. Stack noted the District’s enrollment is declining.
He said the Board will be closing a Neshaminy facility,
which will result in additional revenue that will more than
offset the cost of reduced class size included in the proposed
contract. The
Board has made a commitment to invest a portion of the savings
in educational programs.
One of the best ways to invest in the educational
programs is to reduce class size.
Dr. Bowman said his job as Superintendent of Schools is to
serve the School Board, community and students. There are over 10,000 students in the Neshaminy School
District. Neshaminy
is considered to be a relatively large school district in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Our children are growing up in a society which is much
more difficult than what you or I had to grow up in.
They are faced with many challenges.
They deserve the same opportunities that we had when we
were growing up. In
fact, they deserve more because society is so complex,
difficult, challenging and the family structure has changed
considerably. Today’s
students will be the leaders of this country.
If America is to remain a global leader, we need to
provide the best, highest quality educated student that we can
provide. Public education has been the backbone of America.
Public education has been a top agenda item for the
presidential candidates, today’s President and the Gallop
Poll. In American
it remains to be one of the most important issues being
addressed.
Dr. Bowman stated the Neshaminy School Board members who
serve the community and give of their free time have struggled
with the contract. The
Board members have spent many hours discussing and dialoguing
the issue. The
Board members worked very hard at reaching the proposed
contract agreement. Dr.
Bowman said he felt very comfortable supporting the contract.
Neshaminy has some of the finest teachers in America.
Two of the twenty-four Teacher of the Year finalists
from Pennsylvania are Neshaminy teachers.
Neshaminy has a National Blue Ribbon School.
One of the best middle schools in the nation.
The Neshaminy students are receiving a quality
education. The
District is educating the whole child academically,
emotionally and socially.
Neshaminy has safe schools.
The Neshaminy School District has a rich legacy of
placing a very high value on education and it does cost money.
Everyone needs to work together to reform the way
schools are funded in Pennsylvania.
The solution lies in the way funding is taken care of
across the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Everyone needs to join together, collectively, and find
ways to fund education that takes care of the needs of senior
citizens on fixed incomes and also provides the best quality
education the students deserve.
Neshaminy has advanced placement programs that are
second to none and is putting out quality students.
That costs money.
No one wants a mediocre education for the children.
The students’ future should not be compromised.
In the long term, the future of our community and
nation should not be compromised by having mediocrity in the
classrooms.
Dr. Bowman explained with the proposed contract,
Neshaminy’s teachers will be in the middle of the salary
range of the thirteen school districts in Bucks County.
Going into the classroom every day and teaching
students is a difficult job.
Every day the teachers must have a plan and address the
needs of the students. The
Board wants the teachers to work hard, because the students
deserve it.
Dr. Bowman pointed out the District’s special education
program is very comprehensive.
There are numerous laws and mandates that the District
must meet, and this costs money.
A common ground needs to be found with the community
members to reform educational funding and not neglect the
students. The
proposed contract will provide the opportunity to continue
being a good school district, become better at what the School
District does, take care of the needs of all of the students
and meet all of the mandates.
Dr. Bowman said the Board has not neglected in any way any
of its responsibilities.
The meetings have been difficult and the Board has
worked hard. The Board is making a decision that will be good for
students. The
Board and community need to plan for the future and determine
how to deal with the issue of financing education.
5.
Public
Comment
There was a two minute time limit per speaker.
Mr. Howland, Langhorne, suggested Mr. Knowles (NFT
President) address the public on
the proposed contract issue.
Mr.
Weischedel, Feasterville, said the senior citizens do
want the children to have a good education.
He felt the teachers do not care about the senior
citizens losing their homes.
Mr.
Schieber, Langhorne, explained he and his wife attended
Board Meetings last January and February when consideration
was being given to reducing the music program.
He had hoped to have a very open discussion about the
need for budget cuts. However,
when they arrived at the meetings, the orchestra was on the
stage, the students were wearing tee shirts showing support
for the music program and the music trophies were being
showcased. The
majority of people in attendance were supporting retaining the
current music program and anyone who opposed supporting the
current program was in the minority.
He said the teachers have direct influence on the
children, the children have direct influence on their parents
and the senior citizens get no say at all.
The senior citizens have not been at previous meetings
because they have become very discouraged and a number of the
senior citizens are relatively new to the Neshaminy community.
He advised the Board in the future, the senior citizens
will be represented at Board Meetings.
Mr. Schieber said the senior citizens want their
children and grandchildren to have a great future.
However, the senior citizens deserve a future too and
the School Board is not letting the senior citizens have one.
Mr. Goldstein, Langhorne, questioned whether paying a
teacher a higher salary will result in the teacher being a
better teacher. Is
the Board giving the teachers whatever they want because they
might go out on strike? He
said the teachers have off the whole summer and do not work
evenings, weekends or holidays.
He said the teachers deserve a living wage.
However, an average salary of $73,000 is not so
terrible a salary. On
that salary, teachers can live a lot better than the senior
citizens are today.
A Neshaminy resident asked how the Board can justify
providing the teachers with a $2,000 a year salary increase.
How will the teachers be held accountable?
He inquired if the senior citizens can observe classes
being taught.
6.
Item for
Approval
Motion: Ratification of Contract Between the Neshaminy Board of
School Directors and the Neshaminy Federation of Teachers
Mr. Schoenstadt presented the following motion:
WHEREAS,
the Neshaminy Board of School Directors and the Neshaminy
Federation of Teachers have participated in contract
negotiations; and
WHEREAS,
the negotiating teams of the Neshaminy Board of School
Directors and the Neshaminy Federation of Teachers have
tentatively accepted a proposed collective bargaining
contract; and
WHEREAS,
the Superintendent of Schools has been officially notified
that the membership of the Neshaminy Federation of Teachers
ratified the said proposed contract.
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Neshaminy Board of School
Directors ratify the said proposed contract between the
Neshaminy Federation of Teachers and the Neshaminy School
District commencing July 1, 2002 and ending June 30, 2008.
FUTHER
BE IT RESOLVED that the final contract language and
compilation of collective bargaining agreements are subject to
the approval of the District’s solicitor.
Dr. Frank seconded the motion. Mr. Stack requested a roll call vote. A tally of the roll call vote indicated the Board approved
the motion with seven ayes, Mrs. Bostwick, Mrs. Butville, Mr.
Eccles, Dr. Frank, Mr. Mecleary, Mr. Schoenstadt
and Mr. Stack. (Mr.
Dengler and Mrs. Drioli were absent from the meeting.)
Mr. Stack recessed the meeting at 9:05 p.m. Mr. Stack
reconvened the meeting at 9:15 p.m.
7.
Superintendent’s
Report
No report was presented.
8.
Items for
Approval
a. Overnight Trips
Information distributed prior to the meeting
self-explanatory. Dr.
Bowman presented the following trips for approval:
i) Future Business
Leaders (FBLA) State Conference and Competition - April 18-20,
2001,
Champion, PA
FBLA students from Neshaminy High School and Maple
Point Middle School will be competing.
ii) Neshaminy High
School - State Championship for the Technology Student
Association
Conference - March 28-30, 2001, Champion, PA
There was Board consensus for the two overnight trips.
b. Proposed
School Calendar for 2001-2002
Information distributed prior to the meeting.
Dr. Bowman recommended the 2001-2002 proposed school
calendar be presented for approval at the March 28 Public
Meeting. The
proposed calendar is mirrored much after this year’s
calendar. Since
Labor Day is September 3, the first day of school for teachers
will be September 4 and students’ first day will be
September 5. Dr.
Bowman briefly reviewed the calendar.
Dr. Bowman advised the Board the District’s calendar
includes more days and minutes than is required by the state.
Since the students have exceeded the required number of
days and minutes, they are not required to make up the one
snow day that the District had this year.
Therefore, he recommended the students not be scheduled
to make up the one snow day.
The teachers will be required to make up the snow day
at the end of the school year with an inservice day.
Dr. Bowman noted usually the Thursday before and/or the
Monday after Easter are used as snow make-up days. Last year he received a number of telephone calls from
parents requesting those days not be used as make-up days
because vacation plans had been made for the spring vacation
days. He
recommended in 2001-2002 the spring vacation days not be
listed as make-up days. If
necessary, any snow days be made up at the end of the school
year.
Dr. Bowman explained historically, as long as all of the
state requirements have been met, the Board has allowed the
seniors to graduate as early as possible.
This allows the seniors to attend summer school, start
summer jobs early, etc. If
there are no snow days between now and the March 28 Public
Board Meeting, the graduation date will be announced at the
March 28 meeting. Tentatively
it appears the graduation date will be June 13.
Mrs. Butville noted the proposed calendar does not include
the statement that if necessary the spring vacation days will
be used as make-up days.
Dr. Bowman explained he did not include the statement,
because he would like to have the flexibility to add any
needed make-up days to the end of the school year or use the
spring vacation days. Mrs.
Butville felt the statement should be included on the proposed
calendar so the public is aware the spring vacation days could
possibly be used as make-up days.
Dr. Bowman stated he would add a statement to the
calendar indicating the spring vacation days could tentatively
be used as make-up days.
The 2001-2002 school calendar will be an agenda item at the
March 28 Public Meeting.
c. Intermediate
Unit No. 22 Programs and Services/Instructional Materials
Budget for
2001-2002
Information distributed prior to the meeting.
Dr. Bowman advised the Board the budget information is
on page 13 of the budget booklet. Neshaminy’s obligation to the Intermediate Unit 2001-2002
budget has been reduced by $400.
Approval of the Intermediate Unit budget will be an
agenda item at the March 28 Public Meeting.
d. Summer
School Programs for 2001
Information distributed prior to the meeting.
Dr. Bowman explained the Summer School Programs are
self-supporting. Due
to the increase in costs, the tuition will be increased.
Mr. Boccuti reported the following occurred at the recent
Educational Development Committee Meeting: received an update
on the grades k-6 Language Arts adoption process, presentation
presented on the grade 5 Growth and Development Program,
discussed technology standards and reviewed the Summer School
Program.
Mr. Boccuti advised the Board the tuition for the Summer
School Program was last increased four years ago. The goal is to generate enough revenue to pay for the
program. The
increases are as follows:
Fine Arts $5.00, Summer Stock $10.00, Secondary School
courses $20.00. The
tuition is still extremely competitive with other area summer
schools. Mr.
Mecleary pointed out that Neshaminy students will still
receive first preference for enrollment in the Summer School
Program.
e. Approval of Bids and Budget Transfers
Information distributed prior to the meeting.
Dr. Bowman reviewed the following bids:
Bid No. 02-02 - Technology Education Supplies
Award Amount: $16,409
The bid is for supplies for the instruction of industrial
technology including design, problem solving, research and
development. An
updated copy of the bid will be provided to the Board members.
Bid No. 02-03 - Athletic/Physical Education Supplies
Award Amount: $78,645
The bid is for supplies for physical education programs and
various team sports for the 2001-2002 school year.
Dr. Bowman estimated the bid reflects a 3 to 5 percent
increase over last year’s bid.
Mr. Stack requested all annual bids include the percentage
of increase or decrease over the previous year’s bid on the
bid tabulation form.
Dr. Frank left the meeting at 9:30 p.m.
Dr. Bowman briefly reviewed Budget Transfer Report No.
01-05 (working copy), which includes four transactions and
subtransactions. He
pointed out transfer no. 2 is for $7,900 for the chair lift
purchase for the Heckman School.
Dr. Bowman advised the Board that one of the computer
companies has offered to sell the District $90,000 to $100,000
worth of computer equipment (computers, servers and switches)
for approximately $35,000.
The company is getting out of the computer business and
wants to sell off their computers.
The computers have been in the District for two to
three years, and are currently connected to a satellite dish.
Once the computers are purchased, they will be connected to
the District’s network.
Dr. Bowman recommended funds be transferred from the
reserve account to purchase the computers.
After a brief discussion, it was determined the computer
purchase will be reviewed by the Technology Committee at the
March Meeting.
9.
Items for
Information
No items for information were discussed.
10.
Committee
Reports
a. Educational
Development Committee
Report presented earlier in the meeting as a part of
the Summer School Program for 2001 discussion.
b. Educational
Foundation
Mrs. Bostwick reported the Foundation is proceeding with
the fund raising plans to sell Mercer tiles.
On March 16 there will be a tour of the high school to
see where the tiles will be displayed.
c. Finance Committee
No committee report presented. Mr. Stack requested the committee review the issue of
insurance costs and a bond issue as soon as possible.
d. Intermediate
Unit Board
Intermediate Unit Programs and Services/Instruction
Materials Budget reviewed earlier in the meeting.
e. Intermediate
Unit Legislative
Dr. Bowman noted Mr. Stack represented Neshaminy at the
March 8 state legislative hearing.
Mr. Stack explained at the hearing he had an
opportunity make a presentation on funding for public
education. Representatives from other parts of the state attended the
hearing. The
hearing only allowed for testimony.
There was no dialogue at the hearing.
Mrs. Bostwick said she was told that the audience’s
impression at the hearing was that they should take the issue
back to their School Boards.
f. Board
Policies Committee
Mrs. Butville reported the committee will be meeting on
March 15. The
agenda includes policies pertaining to smoking and student
attendance. Dr.
Bowman reported feedback has been received from the unions’
representatives regarding the smoking policy, and will be
provided at the committee meeting.
g. Technical
School Board
Mr. Mecleary reported that Mr. Parks, Assistant Director,
recently won a BMW, and it would have been a conflict of
interest for him to keep the car.
Therefore, he has donated the car for a raffle that
will benefit the Technical School.
Mr. Mecleary reported the Technical School Board has
begun discussing the Technical School budget.
Neshaminy’s contribution to the Technical School will
be approximately $400,000 less than what was paid last year.
Mrs. Butville reported the Technical School will begin a
partnership with Drexel University.
Drexel University will be using the Technical School as
a satellite location. Courses
will be offered at the Technical School after hours, which the
teachers and students can attend.
Some courses will be offered during the day, which will
enable students to receive college level credits.
The target date for the partnership is September 2001.
h. Technology
Committee
Mr. Stack reported the committee will meet on March 27.
He noted long term decisions need to be made in regard
to technology investments (i.e., elementary labs, PC labs,
etc.). Mrs.
Bostwick requested Mr. Stack ascertain what progress has been
made in the library.
10.
Future
Topics
Mr. Stack noted the future topics are the budget and
continued discussion of enrollment/facilities usage.
He recommended the enrollment/facilities usage issue be
discussed at the April Work Session and the Board develop a
criteria which will be followed to review the financial,
educational, usage, etc. issues.
The Board will need to evaluate the different
facilities against the criteria.
11.
Agenda
Development for March 28, 2001 Public Meeting
Dr. Bowman briefly reviewed the agenda for the March
28, 2001 Public Meeting.
12.
Correspondence
There was no correspondence reviewed.
13.
Other
Board Business
In response to Mr. Eccles’ questions about not pursuing
the Miller School’s kitchen renovation, Dr. Bowman
explained a memorandum from Mrs. Donovan (Director of
Financial Services) was distributed to the Board members
explaining the situation. Attached to the memorandum is a copy of the minutes of the
June 2, 1998 Work Session, which outlines the situation. Dr. Bowman stated the motion presented at the February 27,
2001 meeting was necessary to formally close out the project.
The Board had already decided not to continue any other
work in the Miller School. The Department of Education had been notified of the intent
not to do any further work at the school.
Mr. Schoenstadt noted no work has been done to change the
condition of the Miller School’s cafeteria.
Dr. Bowman pointed out that the school meets prevailing
educational standards. If
the Board were to decide to remodel the kitchen, it would not
receive any reimbursement for any kitchen remodeling costs.
Mrs. Donovan explained the motion was a formality.
In 1998 the Department of Education indicated a motion
was not necessary. However,
now the Department of Education is saying in order to finalize
the project a motion is necessary.
Dr. Bowman said the motion stated the Board is not
going to spend any more money on the Miller School project and
the educational programs are up to code and standards.
Dr. Bowman noted the Board members were provided with an
update on the e-mail he received from Suzanne Vincent,
Poquessing Middle School Assistant Principal, regarding the
Poquessing School incident.
Dr. Bowman advised the Board that Foreign Language Month is
being celebrated at Neshaminy High School and the Board
members are welcomed to participate in the events.
Mr. Mecleary reported he recently received information
regarding grants State Farm Insurance will pay towards the
cost of teachers
acquiring their national board certification.
Mr. Eccles complimented Dr. Bowman and his staff on keeping
the Board members informed of School District issues.
Dr. Bowman said the administration will continue to
make an effort to do this.
In response to Mrs. Butville’s inquiry about the
renovation of the grand piano, Dr. Bowman stated the
renovation issue is being addressed.
Mrs. Butville inquired if there is any cost associated with
the Microsoft Corporation National Examination for Proficiency
being conducted at the high school.
Dr. Bowman stated Mr. Wyatt will provide the Board
members with information on the examination.
Mrs.
Butville moved the meeting be adjourned and Mr. Schoenstadt
seconded the motion. The
Board voted unanimously to adjourn the meeting.
Mr. Stack adjourned the meeting at 9:50 p.m.
Respectfully
submitted,
Carol A.
Calvello
Board Secretary
|